Toys & Training

Canine handler solutions questions from jury in Kristin Good homicide trial


A lot of the Kristin Good homicide trial on Tuesday was as soon as once more devoted to a canine handler who looked for Kristin Good in 1996 with special-trained canines, however earlier than that passed off, the courtroom heard extra questions from jurors.

The jurors often move written inquiries to one of many bailiffs within the Salinas courtroom earlier than the attorneys convention with the choose after which resolve which questions are acceptable to ask.

The questions are then entered into proof and requested by one of many attorneys.

Adela Morris was again on the stand Tuesday. She has spent greater than 30 years coaching canines to detect the scent of human stays.

Brittany Tom/NBC Information Dateline

Canine handler Adela Morris on the stand for a second day Tuesday, Aug. 2, 2022

She was requested a number of the juror questions by Paul Flores’ legal professional, Robert Sanger.

One juror needed to understand how lengthy the scent of a cadaver stays detectable to canines. After a brief back-and-forth between Morris and Sanger, Morris finally mentioned she couldn’t reply the query precisely.

One other juror needed to know if any analysis had been revealed since 1996 that modified Morris’s opinion about her canine, Cholla’s, response. She answered she couldn’t recall studying something that may change her thoughts.

One other juror needed to know if human vomit would trigger the canines to alert. Morris mentioned she didn’t actually know the reply to that query.

Sanger 8-16.JPG

Brittany Tom/NBC Information Dateline

Paul Flores’ protection legal professional Robert Sanger in courtroom Aug. 16, 2022

Questioning continued from all three attorneys within the case for the rest of the morning into the afternoon.

A lot of the questioning centered on what the canines are literally capable of detect or the place the scents come from and the way lengthy they could linger. There was additionally a lot dialogue about how the canines let their handlers know they’ve discovered one thing and the way these handlers interpret what the canines are telling them.

Ruben Flores’ legal professional, Harold Mesick, listed quite a lot of searches that Morris and Cholla had labored on and requested what number of cadavers they’d really discovered. Morris mentioned the group itself had positioned just one physique however helped slim down a search space in others.

Mesick 8-16.JPG

Brittany Tom/NBC Information Dateline

Ruben Flores’ protection legal professional Harold Mesick in courtroom

A second canine handler, Wayne Behrens, additionally searched the dorms and Cal Poly campus for Kristin Good in June of 1996.

He was on the witness stand Tuesday afternoon.

His canine, Sierra, was licensed in cadaver location in June of 1996 simply days earlier than the search of the dorms and campus.

San Luis Obispo County Deputy District Legal professional Christopher Peuvrelle requested once more concerning the certification course of. Behrens mentioned the Workplace of Emergency Companies units the requirements and a company known as CARDA (California Rescue Canine Affiliation) certifies the canines.

Behrens and Sierra finally accomplished six completely different certifications in search and rescue.

The pair was requested to look an space close to the Santa Lucia Dorm. Behrens says the search was blind that means he did not know who or what he was on the lookout for.

Behrens testified Sierra began to alert when she acquired close to the dorm constructing. He finally requested to look contained in the dorm itself. He says Sierra alerted on the door outdoors of Paul’s dorm room.

As soon as inside, Behrens says Sierra alerted to the identical mattress that the opposite search canine had recognized.  Every of the canine handlers have mentioned they weren’t conscious of the opposite canine’s searches of the room.

Paul 2 8-16.JPG

Brittany Tom/NBC Information Dateline

Paul Flores masked in courtroom on Aug. 16, 2022

One other alternate from Paul’s jury was excused from the case Tuesday. That brings the variety of alternates for his case all the way down to 4. No motive was given aside from the choose assured the others concerned within the case that it was not associated to COVID-19. There are three remaining alternates on Ruben’s jury.

Paul Flores is charged with homicide in reference to the 1996 disappearance of Kristin Good, who was final seen returning to the dorms after attending an off-campus social gathering. His father, Ruben, is dealing with a cost of accent after the very fact, accused of serving to cover Kristin’s physique, which has by no means been discovered.

Ruben 8-16.JPG

Brittany Tom/NBC Information Dateline

Ruben Flores in courtroom Aug. 16, 2022

If convicted, Paul faces a sentence of 25 years-to-life. Ruben faces a most sentence of three years behind bars.

The trial is on a break now via subsequent Wednesday.

The case started with opening statements on July 18. The trial may final into October.



Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *