Collars & Leashes

Queensland Ban On Prong Collars May Harm Greyhound Racing

Estimated Studying Time: 4 minutes

Brisbane coach Jedda Cutlack fears a proposed state-government ban on prong collars could have a unfavourable flow-on impact into the greyhound racing business.

Younger gun Queensland coach Jedda Cutlack admits they appear horrible, however she is worried about doable flow-on results from her state’s proposed ban on prong collars.

And the 2021 Younger Achiever of the Yr for greyhounds within the Sunshine State – who has a background in canine obedience coaching – has issued a warning for her friends within the racing business.

We might be subsequent within the firing line.

Cutlack’s warning comes after Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk in Might introduced her authorities would introduce laws into parliament to finish using pronged canine collars.

The RSPCA describes prong collars as follows:

“Pronged collars are made from metallic and are designed to tighten round a canine’s neck every time strain is utilized. These collars have a collection of fang-shaped metallic hyperlinks, or prongs, with blunted factors which pinch a canine’s neck when pulled.

“These collars are used to right undesirable behaviour by way of punishment.

“Sadly, some canine trainers advocate these collars, despite the fact that extra humane coaching strategies can be found, together with rewards-based coaching.”

However Cutlack is adamant a accountable canine handler who is aware of what they’re doing won’t ever must reply to any allegations of pet mistreatment in the event that they use a prong collar responsibly.

“The principle points with that piece of laws are twofold,” she advised Australian Racing Greyhound.

“On one hand, the collars they introduced the laws in for aren’t dangerous.

“I wouldn’t put one on a greyhound, simply because I don’t have the necessity to do it.

“However I come from a working-dog background they usually’re not painful. They appear horrible.

“However when you put one on and also you perceive the mechanics and the way it works – it’s really loads safer for the canines than a number of collars individuals are utilizing on a regular basis.”

Cutlack additionally has a problem with what she believes was an absence of session from the Queensland authorities in the direction of accountable canine homeowners throughout the state.

“The second difficulty with the best way they launched that laws was it didn’t comply with course of in any respect,” she stated.

“They put out the submissions on proposed adjustments to the Animal Welfare Act, and nowhere of their proposed adjustments did they recommend banning that kind of collar.

“So, a number of professionals within the pet-training business and police-dog trainers didn’t make any submissions about prong collars as a result of it wasn’t within the proposed adjustments.

“Then afterwards the federal government got here out and stated ‘attributable to overwhelming suggestions, we’re going to introduce this piece of laws’.

“And I believed ‘cling on, you didn’t ask for our opinion on this’. So throughout the entire parliamentary evaluate course of on it, I do know lots of people who had personal conferences with politicians they usually offered on the public committee.

“Each politician accepted what they have been saying, however would then say ‘OK however they don’t look good. The optics aren’t good’.

“So that you’re pondering ‘OK, do you care concerning the details or do you care about votes?’”

Premier Palaszczuk is adamant the prong collars are merciless on pet canines.

“BREAKING: These pronged canine collars can be banned,” she posted to Fb on Might 8.

“We’re passing laws to crack down on the inhumane remedy of animals in Queensland.

“That features banning the use and possession of pronged canine collars like this one (pictured together with her submit).

“We all know the vast majority of Queenslanders assist more durable penalties and rules towards cruelty to animals.

“That’s why this week we’ll be debating animal welfare legal guidelines within the Queensland Parliament – a problem near the hearts of so many Queenslanders.”

Palaszczuk additionally stated many individuals in her state have been consulted.

“We heard from 1000’s of Queenslanders (2,300 responses from rural residents), and the overwhelming majority supported more durable penalties and rules towards cruelty to animals,” she wrote.

“We’ve taken that suggestions and used it to develop a bundle of suggestions to toughen animal welfare legal guidelines that can be debated within the Queensland Parliament.”

The reactions to Premier Palaszczuk’s announcement have been blended.

“So what further assets are being supplied to the Queensland canine group to help if accountable, effectively educated guardians can’t use instruments whereas being guided by educated trainers to help them to work on their canines reactivity?” Kylie Black posted, drawing 388 likes and 71 loves.
“The quantity of bewilderment of those instruments on this submit & within the wider group is appalling.”
To which Nicole Delaney replied, with 89 likes and 12 loves:
“I don’t care who you might be or what you do that factor shouldn’t be used on a canine. If a coach wants one then they don’t know what they’re doing”.
Cutlack stated these proposed adjustments may in a short time have a flow-on impact to an already closely regulated greyhound racing business.
“A variety of the submissions that folks put in – we went ‘OK, they need to ban it – we in all probability received’t win on attempting to argue that they shouldn’t ban them. We’ll simply comply with the purpose that they didn’t comply with parliamentary course of’,” she stated.

“We nonetheless misplaced – it’s going to occur.

“However when you learn that part of laws, it says they’re prohibiting using prong collars. They usually have a clause in there saying they will embrace every other restraint system.

“For instance, slip leads and harnesses. In order that they don’t must undergo a regulation change to outlaw placing a harness in your canine, or a slip lead.

“And if it’s that straightforward for them to do this, neglect about greyhounds – consider anybody who owns a canine.

“The over-reach there’s insane.”

Cutlack, who received her first race as a 25-year-old in August 2020, needs to see extra younger trainers become involved in greyhound racing.

However she feels the looming prong-collar ban will solely give anti greyhound racing activists extra ammunition of their efforts to have the disciplined banned.

“As a pet coaching group we’re attempting to get extra individuals on board by saying ‘even when you hate prong collars and also you suppose they’re merciless and also you don’t need anybody to make use of them – you need to nonetheless be fearful about how this laws was launched’,” she stated.

“And everybody thinks it’s not going to be them – like individuals concerned in canine sports activities however they don’t race greyhounds.

“They’d say ‘I don’t care in the event that they’re attempting to ban greyhound racing as a result of it’s not us’.

“However they’re on the listing. On the finish of the day they (anti greyhound racing activists) don’t need anybody to (prepare) pets.”

Extra greyhound racing information

Related Greyhound Racing Information

Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *